This is a little project I have been working on:
I got into an argument because some liberal kept telling me to prove the president lied. Very well, you need proof, its all out there. I know there is some pretty serious evidence out there against the President. People claim well the President never actually lied. Well, the President hardly said anything, he had others lie on his behalf (Susan Rice). Still when a person speaks on your behalf and you fail to correct them for several days, you're responsible for that. My intent is to keep this a live article that is continuously updated with new information as it comes in, so people know where to find that evidence in one place. I hope to get support from others who feel the same way I do. If you see an article that you find informative, send me a message with the link so I can add it. If your angry at what I'm doing and you send me a hostile message, with a biased uninformative article. It will only get deleted, so don't waste your time. No longer will you have to tolerate the liberal automated defense of "Prove it with a link." Just simply direct them to this article where they can have access to all the links they ever wanted. Again, I'm hoping to get some support from the community on this. Refer this page to your friends, do some research and send me some links. Let people know, if they want to be informed on the Libya incident, they have a one stop location to find links to all the questions they've had so far. Thank you.
(So far this is the most revealing article to date!)
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/21134540/vp=51847704�
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57528335/security-dwindled-before-deadly-libyan-consulate-attack/
(Lt. Colonel Andrew Woods spoke out because he felt the world had to know)
http://t.news.msn.com/us/us-officials-no-delays-in-rescue-effort-in-libya
(interesting, because according to this timeline it was very clear to the Administration that this was a terrorist attack. Also note how the timeline leaves a lot of questions un-answered. Its basically saying "see we tried.")
http://www.lvrj.com/multimedia/national/23859032
(Biden: "Did your son always have balls the size of cue-balls". Meaning that the VP was aware, only one day after, that Tyrone Woods sacrificed his life to try and save the ambassador. How come the people didn't know? How come the President kept the attack from the American eyes? Also why, if it was so obvious that this was a terrorist attack [after reading the timeline there should have been no question this was a terrorist attack. Flash mobs do not and can not employ crew served weapons, i.e. a mortar system, only organized and trained militias would be capable of such a things] then why did Hillary Clinton blame the death of Tyrone Woods on a film?)
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/161568#.UJMdQIbDuSo
(More stories from an upset parent. I like how the liberals only focus on the parents that say the things they want to hear. But the parents that say the things they don't want to hear are completely ignored.)
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/09/ambassador-susan-rice-libya-attack-not-premeditated/
(Susan, someone who works for the President's administration, flat out claims that it was the video. A "Spontaneous demonstration", despite all the obvios evidence to the contrary. Evidence that can be found in the published timeline. She says the demonstration was "high-jacked"?!? "Tragically two of the four personell were killed while providing security". They were providing security AGAINST ORDERS! Orders to stand DOWN! "We are quite popular in Lybia"?!? "A small handful of heavily armed mobsters"?!? Just watch the whole video and listen to the lies that spew from her tongue. She also re-interates multiple times that its the video's fault. Remember it is her job to speak for the President.)
http://www.forextv.com/forex-news-story/full-transcript-of-obama-s-rose-garden-speech-after-sept-11-benghazi-attack
(The infamous Rose Garden Speech. Listen to the whole thing. The line that gets most people's attention:
"As Americans, let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those both civilian and military who represent us around the globe.
No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.
Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done."
(Acts), meaning plural, means he was referencing all know terrorist attacks. Note also that at no time did he declare that Benghazi was a terrorist attack. lucky for him he managed to utter the word terror is his Rose Garden speech which is surprising considering the next article: )
http://www.forextv.com/forex-news-story/what-is-the-definition-of-terrorism-and-why-is-the-white-house-afraid-of-using-the-term
(So did he refuse to label Benghazi as a terrorist attack because of his political agenda to make his administration appear terrorism free? The white house has been fairly tight lipped about this issue. They instead insist on distracting the public with things like Big Bird, or insults like "Romnesia", and timelines that leave more questions than answers.)
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/02/sources-emails-point-to-communication-breakdown-in-obama-administration-during/
http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/10/17/14495654-more-to-benghazi-attacks-than-surface-at-debate
(His own left leaning media couldn't back him on his blatant blurring of facts in the debate.)
http://www.newsvine.com/_news/2012/10/27/14748260-libyan-witnesses-recount-organized-benghazi-attack
(More evidence that it was obviously a terrorist attack.)
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57535581/obama-to-jon-stewart-benghazi-response-not-optimal/
("The death of four Americans is not optimal"?!? "Find whats broken then fix it" That's a good idea Mr. president. Lets start at the top, with the guy who was supposed to be in charge of the situation.
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/102912-631261-benghazi-stand-down-order-goes-unexplained.htm?p=full
(If research can be shown to back up what he claims, then this is serious.)
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/26/cia-operators-were-denied-request-for-help-during-benghazi-attack-sources-say/
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/26/panetta-military-lacked-enough-information-to-intervene-during-benghazi-attack/
(The defense secretary admits the forces were there and they were told to stand down because "military leaders did not have adequate intelligence." [even though they had a live feed through a drone]. Many people out there don't like FOX news. But that doesn't change what the defense secretary said. The defense secretary himself is admitting that a stand down order was given. So all their timelines, and fake attempts to show how they helped are useless. Additional forces were available that were not deployed. Had these forces been deployed lives could have been saved.)
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-met-panetta-and-biden-wh-benghazi-terror-attack-unfolded
(The President met with his defense secretary on the day of the attack, after the attack was under way. They will not release the details of what was discussed in that meeting.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSvDkwsFsk8&feature=youtu.be
(There are a lot of links from this video involving the hearing. It would be good to visit them.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGV1e8ab3nI&feature=relmfu
(Under Oath. The forces were not withheld due to a lack of funds. Very well. That theory is gone.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3K7ryAS3ISc&feature=relmfu
(Or for those who want the whole picture. Watch the entire hearing)